I have a hard time understanding just what Scott McClellan means when he says “I allowed myself to be deceived”. What exactly does he mean by that statement? It’s important because McClellan, in his capacity as White House press secretary stood before US and foreign television cameras and the world press corps and told what he honestly believed was the truth. And for that he blames himself.
The conundrum presents itself because in his book What Happened, he starts off by saying how he still likes President Bush; thinks he’s “fundamentally decent”; doesn’t think that the president “deliberately or consciously sought to deceive the American people”. But it turns out that not only the president, but several of his cronies lied to Mr. McClellan without Mr. McClellan knowing about it. That’s the crux of the book.
So how can McClellan blame himself?
What bothers me is why he bothered talking about Bush as if the president were some brilliantly glowing example of American leadership and then go about trashing him for the next several hundred pages.
Look, I haven’t read the book; last time I heard, it was yet to be published. But of course there are plenty of copies floating around and almost all of Washington — officials and media personnel — seem to have found a copy somewhere and the latter, especially, are having a heyday with both contents and the premise.
And it appears to me — well, I used the word conundrum meaning — I’m puzzled.
–
To understand what led to this book, one has to go back to the Valerie Plame affair in 2003. A mess which received a lot of coverage but only a fraction of that apportioned to Bill Clinton’s zipper. And yet it was potentially … and eventually became, far more important. It was another case of a sitting president lying.
Speaking of lying, both Clinton and Bush have caused millions to raise their eyebrows when questioned as to their past exposure to drugs. Clinton said he smoked marijuana but didn’t inhale, Bush said he just plain couldn’t remember whether he’d done cocaine or not. Rubbish. And everyone knows it. It simply doesn’t work that way. As far as I’m concerned they both got stoned and were afraid to admit it. I’d like somebody to ask John McCain if he ever smoked a joint. He could say “Yeah, sure, but it was legal then”.
As to the premise of Mr. McClellan’s book and the Valerie Plame business: you may recall that Robert Novak the right-wing writer for the Washington Post as well as other pursuits, blew Plames CIA cover when her husband, Joseph Wilson, a member of former President Clinton’s team and involved in Iraq and Africa told the US people that the Bush administration was ‘full of it’. That Saddam Hussein never bought yellow-cake (used for making nukes) from Niger. So Bush and Co. presumably leaked Wilson’s CIA informant (his wife) to Novak and the cat was out of the bag.
McClellan blames himself for telling the news media that Karl Rove and Vice-president Dick Cheney’s right-hand man, Lewis “Scooter” Libby, had no part in leaking anything to anybody. But Rove, Libby, & Cheney — and George W. Bush all told him Rove and Libby had nothing to do with any leaks.
Well he discovered he’d been lied to when, to make a long story short, Libby was tried, convicted, sentenced and then exonerated by President Bush – a kind of package deal. My goodness, as Scott McClellan says, he felt just awful. So awful he blamed himself. Again: Why?
Does the guy own a crystal ball, is he a psychic, does he have a lantern with a genie inside. No. We can only assume he felt that this bunch of cut-throat politicians, some of the cut-throatiest since the Nixon crowd, were all honest upstanding saints so he blamed himself for not seeing what most of the rest of the country was aware of by 2005 following the Valerie Plame incident: that they were an “administration in which deceit and prevarication were commonplace”, to quote Jonathon Yardley from the Washington Post.
__
McClellan can’t be held responsible for what was being discussed behind closed door in the oval office. He didn’t have a pass. His ilk never has had passes. They are given the company line and told to go out there and face those heathen SOB’s who spread ‘the word’, what ‘the word’ is. As it turned out, ‘the word’ was a bunch of horse-pucky.
Scott McClellan was duped. “It was one of the most painful experiences of my life to have realized that two years earlier” he had told the nation that Rove & Libby weren’t guilty of leaking information. The lid came off, a special prosecutor was appointed and McClellan was the mouthpiece at the center of a national scandal.
So to put things straight he writes this book What Happened . Not, as he puts it “to settle scores or enhance his own role but to record what I know”. Well we can stop right there because Mr. McClellan, if you have done nothing else, you have settled a score. Oh yes. Big Time. Smack in the middle of an election campaign.
So I repeat, not only do I not understand you blaming yourself, I can’t understand why you couch the thrashing you deliver to President Bush with this “I still like him” poop.
How, in the name of all that is mighty can you still like and admire a man who has lied to you and charged you with the task of perpetrating the lie to the entire world. It’s not as if someone said “It wasn’t me who stole your Mars bar” when all the time the chocolate was melting in his back pocket. This was world class BS.
By using a theme of self condemnation coupled with your continued admiration and your apparent conviction that the president had not “consciously sought to deceive the American people” you have succeeded in making yourself look rather foolish. Or at the worst, implemented a bit of doubt as to whether people can really believe you.
Rest easy, those who wish to, will. However don’t expect an invitation to John McCain’s inauguration should things turn out that way.